{"id":292,"date":"2007-12-19T11:38:03","date_gmt":"2007-12-19T11:38:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gtes.traperia.com\/?p=292"},"modified":"2020-01-02T12:26:43","modified_gmt":"2020-01-02T12:26:43","slug":"la-medicion-del-bienestar-social-relacionado-con-la-salud","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gtes.traperia.com\/en\/2007\/12\/19\/la-medicion-del-bienestar-social-relacionado-con-la-salud\/","title":{"rendered":"La Medici\u00f3n del Bienestar Social Relacionado con la Salud"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em>Estudios de Econom\u00eda Aplicada,<\/em><\/strong> vol. 25(3), pp. 927 &#8211; 950.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Autores: Jose-Mar\u00eda Abell\u00e1n Perpi\u00f1\u00e1n, Fernando I. S\u00e1nchez Mart\u00ednez, Jorge E. Mart\u00ednez P\u00e9rez.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Resumen<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>En este art\u00edculo revisamos de forma sistem\u00e1tica los enfoques que se han utilizado para medir preferencias colectivas relacionadas con la salud. Sugerimos que las preferencias relacionadas con la salud que deber\u00edan medirse para tomar decisiones sociales son aquellas que combinan ego\u00edsmo y altruismo (\u201cpreferencias personales socialmente inclusivas\u201d), y que el m\u00e9todo m\u00e1s apropiado para medir tales preferencias es el \u201dvelo de la ignorancia\u201d. Presentamos un estudio piloto en el que se prueban distintos m\u00e9todos para medir las preferencias que tratan de suscitar diferentes perspectivas en los sujetos (personal, social y personal socialmente inclusiva). Los resultados preliminares sugieren que el m\u00e9todo del \u201cvelo de la ignorancia\u201d puede ser \u00fatil para medir preferencias mixtas, situadas a mitad de camino entre las estrictamente personales y las puramente sociales o altruistas. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This paper systematizes the different approaches used to measure health related social preferences. We suggest that those preferences involving both personal and altruistic concerns (the so-called \u201csocially inclusive personal preferences\u201d) should be used to make social decisions. We argue that the best existing method for eliciting such preferences is the \u201cveil of ignorance\u201d approach. We report on the results of a pilot study in which we try different methods of eliciting preferences, each of them inducing different perspectives (personal, social and socially inclusive preferences). Preliminary results suggest that the \u201cveil of ignorance\u201d approach could be a useful method to elicit those \u201cmixed\u201d preferences that lay in-between personal and social (altruistic) preferences. <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Estudios de Econom\u00eda Aplicada, vol. 25(3), pp. 927 &#8211; 950. Autores: Jose-Mar\u00eda Abell\u00e1n Perpi\u00f1\u00e1n, Fernando I. S\u00e1nchez Mart\u00ednez, Jorge E. Mart\u00ednez P\u00e9rez. Resumen En este art\u00edculo revisamos de forma sistem\u00e1tica los enfoques que se han utilizado para medir preferencias colectivas relacionadas con la salud. Sugerimos que las preferencias relacionadas con la salud que deber\u00edan medirse &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/gtes.traperia.com\/en\/2007\/12\/19\/la-medicion-del-bienestar-social-relacionado-con-la-salud\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> \u00abLa Medici\u00f3n del Bienestar Social Relacionado con la Salud\u00bb<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":294,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-292","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articulos","category-publicaciones"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gtes.traperia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gtes.traperia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gtes.traperia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gtes.traperia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gtes.traperia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=292"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/gtes.traperia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":437,"href":"https:\/\/gtes.traperia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292\/revisions\/437"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gtes.traperia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/294"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gtes.traperia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=292"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gtes.traperia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=292"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gtes.traperia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=292"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}